Powered By Blogger

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Playboy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Playboy. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

XXX WEB DOMAIN: Adult-industry leaders fear domain may become mandatory, used to shut them down

















Tue December 6, 2011





On Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of websites with the .xxx suffix will go live


STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Adult industry's .XXX websites set to roll out on Tuesday

The domain-name suffix is designed to make porn safer, easier to identify

Adult-industry leaders fear domain may become mandatory, used to shut them down

Proponents say .XXX will make porn sites safer from viruses and other malware

It's either a new, safer era for adult content on the Web or the first step in creating a digital porn ghetto, depending upon who you ask.



On Tuesday at 11 a.m. ET, more than 100,000 websites are expected to go live with the new .xxx domain.



The suffix was approved as a "top-level domain" address last year by ICANN, the international not-for-profit that coordinates Web addresses. The idea, they say, is to more safely organize content that has become, like it or not, common on the Web.

"The Internet is home to a wealth of content, suitable for a wide range of ages and values," reads a statement on the website of ICM Registry, which is responsible for handing out the new domain names. "The adult entertainment industry has, and always will, account for a large amount of this content and while it is enjoyed by some, it is not suitable, or of interest, to all Internet users.

"Regardless of your views on adult content, it's here to stay, so let's be adult about it."

The group says that creating the suffix will act much like .gov, .edu or .org, giving Web users a heads-up about what sort of site they are visiting based on its Web address alone.

In theory, that would help keep people from stumbling into porn by accident and make it easier for parents to keep their children away from the sites. It also would let users who want to view adult content know that they're visiting a safe, legitimate and legal site.

Porn, or the promise of porn, is frequently used online in suggestive links that mask viruses, phishing attempts and other harmful malware.

By applying for a .xxx site, webmasters, adult performers, studios and others become part of a "sponsored community," agreeing to operate legally and within agreed-upon business standards. Each .xxx site will be scanned daily with McAfee protection tools, which ICM says will help make them among the Web's safest destinations.

But as you might expect, not everyone is pleased with the move.

Some religious organizations have argued against the new .xxx names, saying that creating them amounts to an endorsement of porn.

"The establishment of a .xxx domain would increase, not decrease, the spread of pornography on the Internet, causing even more harm to children, families and communities," said Patrick Trueman, CEO of Morality in Media and former chief of the U.S. Department of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, when ICANN was voting on the plan.

The new .xxx sites will be tagged in a way that will make it easy for parents, employers or others to block them on their networks. Parents can block adult sites via parental-controls settings on most computers' control panels or by installing parental-control software.

To protect their reputations against porn purveyors who might seek to capitalize on their name, some universities and businesses have bought .xxx domain names that correspond with their .edu or .com addresses. For example, Penn State in September paid $200 each for four .xxx domains: Penn State, PSU, Nittany Lions and The Pennsylvania State University, according to the university's student newspaper.

The proliferation of .xxx addresses doesn't mean porn will disappear from .com sites. Adult sites that buy a .xxx domain are free to keep their .com or other current URL as well.

Those who oppose the .xxx domains on moral or religious grounds are being joined by critics from the opposite end of the spectrum.

Some in the porn industry fear that creating the opt-in domain could just be a first step toward making it mandatory. Then, they say, it would make it all too easy for a government somewhere to censor adult content by simply blocking access to all .xxx sites.

Playboy had been leading the charge against the new branding.

Manwin, the Luxembourg-based company that runs Playboy.com and other adult sites, has filed suit in California to stop the implementation of .xxx and said last week that it won't do business with or allow its content to be used on any sites using the suffix.

"We oppose the .XXX domain and all it stands for," said Fabian Thylmann, managing partner of Manwin, in a news release. "It is my opinion that .XXX domain is an anticompetitive business practice that works a disservice to all companies that do business on the Internet."

But not all in the industry are lined up against it.

"We believe the future of adult entertainment online is in the .xxx top level domain," said Adam Osborn, head of digital at Paul Raymond Publications. "We see a huge benefit in the adult community having an online space dedicated to our content."

The cost of registering a .xxx domain name can vary dramatically, from a few hundred dollars to simply keep someone else from using an address to much more for sites that may direct hundreds of URLs to the same content.

ICANN has established rules to prevent the early-Internet phenomenon of "cybersquatting," when someone pays the fee and grabs a name apparently associated with someone else. For example, WhiteHouse.com was, for years, a porn site. (Like most U.S. agencies, the real White House uses .gov.)

The ICM has set up an arbitration system to resolve complaints when someone claims an address applicant has improperly taken a URL that should be theirs.
































































Friday, July 29, 2011

HOT CELEBRITIES: Crystal Harris Gets Candid About Split With Hugh Hefner







"Runaway bride" Crystal Harris is coming clean about her June split with Hugh Hefner.


"I got cold feet," she told Billy Bush and guest co-host Kate Walsh on Tuesday's Access Hollywood Live.

"Over time I just realized it wasn't for me, it was all happening so fast," Crystal said of her planned wedding to the Playboy founder. "Sex with Hugh lasted two seconds!", she candidly has asserted.

Though she was dubbed a "runaway bride" on the cover of Playboy, the blonde Playmate said the men's magazine mogul was aware that she was leaving.

"I actually spoke to Hef about it before I left and we both came to the decision that [getting married] wasn't the best for either of us," she continued.

When asked about being intimate with the 85-year-old, Crystal said their time alone mostly involved "couch cuddling, movie nights... Hef's like a big kid."

"Was it ever physical?" Billy asked.

"In the beginning, but after a while it just wasn't the most important thing to him," Crystal revealed.

Adding, "I love Hef. I care about Hef and always will. We had good times together... I've been over there about three or four times since the breakup and we want to just stay friends."

The 25-year-old also told Billy and Kate that she's not currently dating, but is open to a new man coming into her life. She also squashed a rumor that she's involved with Dr. Phil's son, Jordan McGraw -- at least, at the moment.

"Jordan is one of my best friends, we've known each other for a year and he will continue to be one of my really good friends," she said.

But can she ever foresee a romance brewing with Jordan?

"We'll see," she said with a smile.























Saturday, July 16, 2011

U20 SOCCER WORLD CUP: GERMANY PLAYERS POSED FOR PLAYBOY









If people weren’t excited enough about the Women’s World Cup in Germany, those good folks at Playboy have gone and sent interest through the roof after doing a covershoot with five members of the German U-20 national team


Annika Doppler (Bayern Munich), Kristina Gessat (FSV Gutersloh), Ivana Rudelic (Bayern), Julia Simic (Bayern) and Selina Wagner (Wolfsburg) all posed in various states of undress for the adult magazine.In the accompanying interview, the footballers discuss how they find the “erroneous image of the unattractive football player” to be the “most annoying” stereotype about the women’s game and how they’re trying to get away from that image by attaching more importance to their appearance.

German World Cup finals Playboy

They also say how they think it’s easier for female footballers to be openly gay than it is for male footballers, and talk about and whether or not they would want Louis “The Party Beast” van Gaal as a manager.

Recently, five members of the German National Women's U-20 team posed erotically for the German edition of Playboy, in hopes of promoting the sport just weeks before the Women's World Cup kicks off. The idea was to show the more beautiful side of women's sports, as opposed to the "butch" stereotype that they feel shrouds the game.

Bayern Munich players Annika Doppler, Ivana Rudelic and Julia Simic as well as Wolfsburg's Selina Wagner and Gutersloh's Kristina Gessat all stripped down for the shoot.

"With these photos, we want to disprove the cliche that all female footballers are butch," Gessat told the media.
The Deutscher Fussball-Bund (DFB), soccer's governing body in Germany, apparently had nothing to do with the shoot, and according to the Daily Mail, Playboy went right to the players (who are all aged 19 to 22) and not their teams.

Whether or not there's any backlash over these photos remains to be seen, but one thing's for sure: they definitely helped spread the word on the Women's World Cup

THE "ADULT" GERMANY TEAM TOO

Seven years after FIFA president Sepp Blatter suggested in all seriousness that "pretty" women footballers should "have tighter shorts" to "create a more female aesthetic" members of the German national squad have made the old man's dream come true by posing for Playboy ahead of the Women's World Cup.


Five young footballers - Annika Doppler (Bayern Munich), Kristina Gessat (FSV Gutersloh), Ivana Rudelic (Bayern), Julia Simic (Bayern) and Selina Wagner (Wolfsburg) - all donned hotpants and a tight white tops in sexy mockery of the German strip and posed in various states of undress for a cover shoot .

The adult magazine goes on sale on top shelves all over Germany this week and in the accompanying interview the frauleins claim they did the shoot to debunk the "erroneous image of the unattractive football player". With Gutersloh's Gessat adding: "The message is, look, we are normal - and lovely - girls."

The Deutscher Fussball-Bund didn't know anything about the shoot beforehand but the stunt has succeeded in promoting the Women's World Cup